↓ Skip to main content

NCCN Guidelines Insights: Head and Neck Cancers, Version 2.2017.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN), June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Head and Neck Cancers, Version 2.2017.
Published in
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN), June 2017
DOI 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0101
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Adelstein, Maura L Gillison, David G Pfister, Sharon Spencer, Douglas Adkins, David M Brizel, Barbara Burtness, Paul M Busse, Jimmy J Caudell, Anthony J Cmelak, A Dimitrios Colevas, David W Eisele, Moon Fenton, Robert L Foote, Jill Gilbert, Robert I Haddad, Wesley L Hicks, Ying J Hitchcock, Antonio Jimeno, Debra Leizman, William M Lydiatt, Ellie Maghami, Loren K Mell, Bharat B Mittal, Harlan A Pinto, John A Ridge, James Rocco, Cristina P Rodriguez, Jatin P Shah, Randal S Weber, Matthew Witek, Frank Worden, Sue S Yom, Weining Zhen, Jennifer L Burns, Susan D Darlow

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 13%
Other 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 20 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 20 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2024.
All research outputs
#4,095,147
of 34,451,315 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN)
#572
of 2,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,544
of 365,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN)
#14
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,451,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.