↓ Skip to main content

Motoneuron Death Triggered by a Specific Pathway Downstream of Fas Potentiation by ALS-Linked SOD1 Mutations

Overview of attention for article published in Neuron, September 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
30 patents

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Motoneuron Death Triggered by a Specific Pathway Downstream of Fas Potentiation by ALS-Linked SOD1 Mutations
Published in
Neuron, September 2002
DOI 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00905-4
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Death pathways restricted to specific neuronal classes could potentially allow for precise control of developmental neuronal death and also underlie the selectivity of neuronal loss in neurodegenerative disease. We show that Fas-triggered death of normal embryonic motoneurons requires transcriptional upregulation of neuronal NOS and involves Daxx, ASK1, and p38 together with the classical FADD/caspase-8 cascade. No evidence for involvement of this pathway was found in cells other than motoneurons. Motoneurons from transgenic mice overexpressing ALS-linked SOD1 mutants (G37R, G85R, or G93A) displayed increased susceptibility to activation of this pathway: they were more sensitive to Fas- or NO-triggered cell death but not to trophic deprivation or excitotoxic stimulation. Thus, triggering of a motoneuron-restricted cell death pathway by neighboring cells might contribute to motoneuron loss in ALS.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 139 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 19%
Researcher 24 17%
Professor 15 11%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 27 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 30%
Neuroscience 26 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 11%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 30 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2020.
All research outputs
#5,074,702
of 34,089,221 outputs
Outputs from Neuron
#5,186
of 10,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,649
of 72,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuron
#25
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,089,221 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.