↓ Skip to main content

Examining key design decisions involved in developing a serious game for child sexual abuse prevention

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Examining key design decisions involved in developing a serious game for child sexual abuse prevention
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00073
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This paper presents a case study of the key decisions made in the design of Orbit, a child sexual abuse prevention computer game targeted at school students between 8 and 10 years of age. Key decisions include providing supported delivery for the target age group, featuring adults in the program, not over-sanitizing game content, having a focus on building healthy self-concept of players, making the game engaging and relatable for all players and evaluating the program. This case study has implications for the design of Serious Games more generally, including that research should underpin game design decisions, game designers should consider ways of bridging the game to real life, the learning that arises from the game should go beyond rote-learning, designers should consider how the player can make the game-world their own and comprehensive evaluations of Serious Games should be undertaken.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 119 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 42 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 21%
Social Sciences 18 15%
Computer Science 14 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 46 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2014.
All research outputs
#13,041,309
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#12,192
of 29,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,714
of 305,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#106
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.