↓ Skip to main content

Why Do Students Often Fail to Use Learning Strategies That Experts Have Found Effective? An Intra-Individual Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 351)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why Do Students Often Fail to Use Learning Strategies That Experts Have Found Effective? An Intra-Individual Analysis
Published in
The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, January 2013
DOI 10.5926/jjep.61.32
Authors

TOSHIO YOSHIDA, KOU MURAYAMA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 32 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 15%
Researcher 5 15%
Lecturer 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 33%
Social Sciences 6 18%
Linguistics 3 9%
Computer Science 2 6%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2023.
All research outputs
#5,130,191
of 25,197,939 outputs
Outputs from The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology
#35
of 351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,330
of 294,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,197,939 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 351 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.