↓ Skip to main content

Stroboscopic Vision to Induce Sensory Reweighting During Postural Control.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Stroboscopic Vision to Induce Sensory Reweighting During Postural Control.
Published in
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, June 2017
DOI 10.1123/jsr.2017-0035
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Patients with somatosensory deficits have been found to rely more on visual feedback for postural control. However, current balance tests may be limited in identifying increased visual dependence (sensory reweighting to the visual system), as options are typically limited to eyes open or closed conditions with no progressions between. To assess the capability of stroboscopic glasses to induce sensory reweighting of visual input during single-leg balance. Descriptive Setting: Laboratory Participants: Eighteen healthy subjects without vision or balance disorders or lower extremity injury history (9 females; age=22.1±2.1 years; height=169.8±8.5cm; mass=66.5±10.6kg) participated. Subjects performed 3 trials of unipedal stance for 10 seconds with eyes open (EO) and closed (EC), and with stroboscopic vision (SV) that was completed with specialized eyewear that intermittently cycled between opaque and transparent for 100 milliseconds at a time. Balance tasks were performed on firm and foam surfaces, with the order randomized. Ten center-of-pressure parameters were computed. Separate ANOVAs with repeated measures found significant differences between the 3 visual conditions on both firm (Ps=<.001) and foam (Ps=<.001 to .005) surfaces for all measures. For trials on firm surface, almost all measures showed that balance with SV was significantly impaired relative to EO, but less impaired than EC. On the foam surface, almost all postural stability measures demonstrated significant impairments with SV compared with EO, but the impairment with SV was similar to EC. SV impairment of single-leg balance was large on the firm surface, but not to the same degree as EC. However, the foam surface disruption to somatosensory processing and sensory reweighting to vision lead to greater disruptive effects of SV to the same level as EC. This indicates that when the somatosensory system is perturbed even a moderate decrease in visual feedback (SV) may induce an EC level impairment to postural control during single-leg stance.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Researcher 4 5%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 37 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 15%
Sports and Recreations 13 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 11%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 37 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,168,593
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
#264
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,764
of 365,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them