↓ Skip to main content

Circulating Adiponectin Levels Differ Between Patients with Multiple Myeloma and its Precursor Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Circulating Adiponectin Levels Differ Between Patients with Multiple Myeloma and its Precursor Disease
Published in
Obesity, June 2017
DOI 10.1002/oby.21894
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

An increased risk of multiple myeloma (MM) has been observed among individuals with low prediagnostic circulating levels of adiponectin, a metabolic hormone that is typically underexpressed among those with overweight or obesity. To assess whether adiponectin may influence myeloma development or progression to frank MM, circulating adiponectin levels were compared across patients with different stages of MM and its precursor, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Adiponectin was measured in 213 patients with MGUS, smoldering MM, or fully developed MM. Differences in adiponectin levels across patient groups were assessed using multivariate linear regression. Relative to MGUS patients, adiponectin levels were statistically significantly lower among those with smoldering and fully developed MM, both overall (16%-20% decrease; P = 0.048) and among those with IgG/IgA isotypes (26%-28% decrease; P = 0.004). Among MGUS patients, adiponectin levels were significantly lower for those with the higher-risk IgM isotype compared with those who had IgG/IgA isotypes (42% decrease; P = 0.036). The findings of this study, the largest to investigate adiponectin levels in patients with different stages of MM and the first to evaluate associations with clinical characteristics, suggest that reduced expression of adiponectin may be associated with progression from MGUS to MM.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 22%
Other 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 44%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Unknown 12 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2017.
All research outputs
#16,707,477
of 24,571,708 outputs
Outputs from Obesity
#3,356
of 4,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,838
of 321,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity
#58
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,571,708 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.