↓ Skip to main content

Spacer capture and integration by a type I-F Cas1–Cas2-3 CRISPR adaptation complex

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Spacer capture and integration by a type I-F Cas1–Cas2-3 CRISPR adaptation complex
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2017
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1618421114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
China 1 <1%
Unknown 167 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 23%
Researcher 25 15%
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 36 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 69 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Chemistry 4 2%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 40 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,755,388
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#31,228
of 119,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,164
of 366,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#485
of 939 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 939 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.