↓ Skip to main content

Scale Reduction of a Systems Coagulation Model With an Application to Modeling Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Data

Overview of attention for article published in CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Scale Reduction of a Systems Coagulation Model With an Application to Modeling Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Data
Published in
CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, January 2014
DOI 10.1038/psp.2013.67
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Bridging systems biology and pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics has resulted in models that are highly complex and complicated. They usually contain large numbers of states and parameters and describe multiple input-output relationships. Based on any given data set relating to a specific input-output process, it is possible that some states of the system are either less important or have no influence at all. In this study, we explore a simplification of a systems pharmacology model of the coagulation network for use in describing the time course of fibrinogen recovery after a brown snake bite. The technique of proper lumping is used to simplify the 62-state systems model to a 5-state model that describes the brown snake venom-fibrinogen relationship while maintaining an appropriate mechanistic relationship. The simplified 5-state model explains the observed decline and recovery in fibrinogen concentrations well. The techniques used in this study can be applied to other multiscale models.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 3%
Netherlands 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 35 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 47%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Student > Master 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Mathematics 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2014.
All research outputs
#22,349,506
of 27,348,485 outputs
Outputs from CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology
#660
of 861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,941
of 326,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,348,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 861 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.