↓ Skip to main content

The TAR-RNA binding protein is required for immunoresponses triggered by Cardiovirus infection

Overview of attention for article published in Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The TAR-RNA binding protein is required for immunoresponses triggered by Cardiovirus infection
Published in
Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications, October 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.10.023
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

LGP2 and MDA5 cooperate to detect viral RNA in the cytoplasm of Picornavirus-infected cells and activate innate immune responses. To further define regulatory components of RNA recognition by LGP2/MDA5, a yeast two-hybrid screen was used to identify LGP2-interacting proteins. The screening has identified the TAR-RNA binding protein (TRBP), which is known to be an essential factor for RNA interference (RNAi). Immuno-precipitation experiments demonstrated that TRBP interacted specifically with LGP2 but not with related RIG-I-like receptors, RIG-I or MDA5. siRNA knockdown experiments indicate that TRBP is important for Cardiovirus-triggered interferon responses, but TRBP is not involved in Sendai virus-triggered interferon response that is mediated mainly by RIG-I. To support functional interaction with LGP2, overexpressed TRBP increased Cardiovirus-triggered interferon promoter activity only when LGP2 and MDA5 are co-expressed but not MDA5 alone. Together, our findings illustrate a possible connection between an RNAi-regulatory factor and antiviral RNA recognition that is specifically required for a branch of the virus induced innate immune response.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 31%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 6 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2017.
All research outputs
#31,576,053
of 34,763,505 outputs
Outputs from Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications
#30,363
of 33,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,477
of 336,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications
#183
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,763,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.