↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A high-throughput microdialysis–parallel solid phase extraction–inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry hyphenated system for continuous monitoring of extracellular metal ions in living rat brain
Published in
Journal of Chromatography A, December 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.12.047
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To significantly improve the temporal resolving power of in vivo trace brain metal monitoring system, in this paper we describe a novel analytical configuration combining the dual functions of online segmentation of the rat brain microdialysate and parallel solid phase extraction (SPE) of multiple segmented samples. In contrast to traditional SPE procedures, in this study the three pumped media-the buffered rat brain microdialysate, the eluent, and the air stream-were converted to a series of segmented streams through the manipulation of a flow-through stream selector. After optimizing this online automatic MD/parallel poly(vinyl chloride) SPE/inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry hyphenated system for the analysis of ultra-trace metal ions, the sample volume of the microdialysate was set at 0.83μL, the analytical sequence was repeatable every 20s, and the detection limits were in the range 0.03-0.24μgL(-1), with spike analyses of Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn in a rat brain ECF sample agreeing well with expected values (88-107%). To further examine the system's practicability, we also performed (i) in vivo dynamic monitoring of these trace metal ions in living rat brain extracellular fluid post-probe implantation (the basal values for Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn were 1.17±0.18, 1.27±0.36, 2.46±0.62, 0.86±0.37, and 2.35±0.55μgL(-1), respectively) and (ii) real-time visualization of the physiological response to acute neural depolarization elicited upon perfusing a high-K(+) medium through the MD probe.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 23%
Student > Master 2 15%
Lecturer 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 38%
Engineering 3 23%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2014.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chromatography A
#8,759
of 11,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,486
of 320,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chromatography A
#50
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,800 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.