↓ Skip to main content

Maturation of Lobster Stomatogastric Ganglion Rhythmic Activity

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurophysiology, October 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Maturation of Lobster Stomatogastric Ganglion Rhythmic Activity
Published in
Journal of Neurophysiology, October 1999
DOI 10.1152/jn.1999.82.4.2006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The stomatogastric ganglion of the adult lobster, Homarus americanus generates extremely regular pyloric rhythms with a characteristic period of 0.5-1.5 Hz. To study the changes in the pyloric rhythm during embryonic and larval development, we recorded excitatory junctional potentials evoked by lateral pyloric (LP) neuron activity. Early in development the motor discharge of the LP neuron was often irregular, preventing use of conventional analysis methods that rely on extracting burst times to calculate cycle frequency and its variability. Instead, cycle frequency was determined for the LP neuron from the peak of the power spectrum obtained from the occurrence times of excitatory junctional potentials in the p1 muscle. The ratio of the power in the peak to the power from 0 to 3 Hz was used as a relative measure of the regularity of the rhythm. Throughout embryonic and the first larval stage, LP neuron activity is slow, irregular, and only weakly periodic. The regularity of the rhythm increased during midlarval stages, and both the frequency and regularity increased considerably by the postlarval stage LIV.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 38%
Professor 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 32%
Neuroscience 12 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Linguistics 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 7 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#14,896,473
of 23,832,995 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurophysiology
#4,583
of 8,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,845
of 35,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurophysiology
#34
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,832,995 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,266 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.