↓ Skip to main content

Trends in Musical Theatre Voice: An Analysis of Audition Requirements for Singers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Voice, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
15 X users
facebook
12 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Trends in Musical Theatre Voice: An Analysis of Audition Requirements for Singers
Published in
Journal of Voice, January 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.10.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn Green, Warren Freeman, Matthew Edwards, David Meyer

Abstract

The American musical theatre industry is a multibillion dollar business in which the requirements for singers are varied and complex. This study identifies the musical genres and voice requirements that are currently most requested at professional auditions to help voice teachers, pedagogues, and physicians who work with musical theatre singers understand the demands of their clients' business.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 123 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Researcher 6 5%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 42 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 36 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 8%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 47 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2017.
All research outputs
#1,844,485
of 27,947,050 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Voice
#84
of 2,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,434
of 329,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Voice
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,947,050 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,467 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.