↓ Skip to main content

Roll your own cigarettes are less natural and at least as harmful as factory rolled tobacco

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
35 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
4 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Roll your own cigarettes are less natural and at least as harmful as factory rolled tobacco
Published in
British Medical Journal, February 2014
DOI 10.1136/bmj.f7616
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Psychology 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,082,458
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#9,521
of 75,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,248
of 381,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#98
of 775 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 75,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 775 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.