↓ Skip to main content

Protein-guided RNA dynamics during early ribosome assembly

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
298 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Protein-guided RNA dynamics during early ribosome assembly
Published in
Nature, February 2014
DOI 10.1038/nature13039
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The assembly of 30S ribosomes requires the precise addition of 20 proteins to the 16S ribosomal RNA. How early binding proteins change the ribosomal RNA structure so that later proteins may join the complex is poorly understood. Here we use single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) to observe real-time encounters between Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S4 and the 16S 5' domain RNA at an early stage of 30S assembly. Dynamic initial S4-RNA complexes pass through a stable non-native intermediate before converting to the native complex, showing that non-native structures can offer a low free-energy path to protein-RNA recognition. Three-colour FRET and molecular dynamics simulations reveal how S4 changes the frequency and direction of RNA helix motions, guiding a conformational switch that enforces the hierarchy of protein addition. These protein-guided dynamics offer an alternative explanation for induced fit in RNA-protein complexes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 8 3%
United Kingdom 4 1%
China 3 1%
Japan 2 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 275 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 30%
Researcher 64 21%
Student > Master 31 10%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Professor 15 5%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 28 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 101 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 81 27%
Chemistry 38 13%
Physics and Astronomy 20 7%
Engineering 8 3%
Other 22 7%
Unknown 28 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2022.
All research outputs
#809,494
of 24,410,879 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#28,595
of 94,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,312
of 323,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#447
of 926 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,410,879 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 101.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 926 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.