↓ Skip to main content

Patient reported outcomes of autologous fat grafting after breast cancer surgery

Overview of attention for article published in The Breast, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Patient reported outcomes of autologous fat grafting after breast cancer surgery
Published in
The Breast, June 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.breast.2017.06.006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Autologous fat grafting (AFG) can be used as an adjunct in breast cancer surgery to improve contour defects. Few previous studies have assessed patient reported outcomes (PROs) for AFG. This study analysed AFG use and assessed PROs in terms of physical and psychosocial well-being. All patients undergoing AFG were identified from a prospective database and asked to complete the validated BREAST-Q questionnaire and a tool to assess patient-perceived change after AFG (5-point Likert-type scale). Descriptive statistics were computed for all BREAST-Q and perceived change subscales. Independent sample t-tests were conducted to compare scores on each of the BREAST-Q and perceived change subscales by type of breast cancer surgery and radiotherapy status. 156 AFG sessions were performed over 4 years on 119 breasts in 88 patients. Fifty-seven patients received AFG after reconstruction and 19 after breast conserving surgery. Forty-six patients (52%) completed the questionnaire. BREAST-Q scores (out of 100) and patient-perceived change after AFG (out of 5) were respectively: 54 and 4.0 for Breast satisfaction, 69 and 3.3 for Physical well-being and 60 and 3.6 for Psychosocial well-being. Radiotherapy status and type of surgery made little difference. Number of AFG procedures positively correlated with perceived improvement. Autologous fat grafting was associated with improved patient satisfaction despite small volumes transferred. BREAST-Q scores were comparable with previously published series on reconstructive breast surgery. Perceived change after AFG was no different in patients receiving radiotherapy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Other 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 17 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Engineering 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Chemistry 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 19 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2017.
All research outputs
#9,098,633
of 27,630,097 outputs
Outputs from The Breast
#627
of 1,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,698
of 338,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Breast
#13
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,630,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.