Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TMVr) with MitraClip has proved to be safe and effective for high-risk surgical patients with severe symptomatic degenerative mitral regurgitation. There is paucity of data regarding its use in functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of MitraClip in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe FMR and a high surgical risk. Medical libraries were systematically searched for studies assessing the use of MitraClip for patients with symptomatic moderate or severe FMR and a high surgical risk. Studies reporting safety and efficacy outcomes at 12 months were included in the analysis. A total of 12 studies including 1,695 patients (age 73 [interquartile range [IQR] 70.5 to 74], 69.8% men, left ventricular ejection fraction 32.5% [IQR 29.5 to 36], New York Heart Association class II to IV) who underwent TMVr with MitraClip were included in the analysis. Acute procedural success was 89% (IQR 85.5 to 92). Ischemic cardiomyopathy was the most common cause of left ventricular dysfunction. Over 2/3 of patients had known coronary artery disease, 35% a previous myocardial infarction, and 38.5% had a previous cardiac surgery. Survival to hospital discharge was 98% (IQR 97 to 100) and 30-day survival 97% (IQR 96 to 98). Overall survival at 12 months was 82% (IQR 77 to 87). Mitral valve re-intervention at 12 months was infrequent (3%; IQR 2 to 6.5). In conclusion, our pooled analysis suggests that TMVr with MitraClip is feasible, safe, and carries a low rate of mitral valve re-intervention at 12 months in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe FMR and a high surgical risk.
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
1
1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
1
1%
Other
2
3%
Unknown
33
48%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2019.
All research outputs
#6,206,355
of 33,992,632 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Cardiology
#3,689
of 15,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,249
of 363,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Cardiology
#27
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,992,632 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
