↓ Skip to main content

Economic evaluation of nurse staffing and nurse substitution in health care: A scoping review

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nursing Studies, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
5 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Economic evaluation of nurse staffing and nurse substitution in health care: A scoping review
Published in
International Journal of Nursing Studies, September 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.07.018
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Several systematic reviews have suggested that greater nurse staffing as well as a greater proportion of registered nurses in the health workforce is associated with better patient outcomes. Others have found that nurses can substitute for doctors safely and effectively in a variety of settings. However, these reviews do not generally consider the effect of nurse staff on both patient outcomes and costs of care, and therefore say little about the cost-effectiveness of nurse-provided care. Therefore, we conducted a scoping literature review of economic evaluation studies which consider the link between nurse staffing, skill mix within the nursing team and between nurses and other medical staff to determine the nature of the available economic evidence.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Canada 3 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 134 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 19%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Professor 12 8%
Other 30 21%
Unknown 29 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 44 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 20%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 5%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 4%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 31 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,585,474
of 27,932,147 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nursing Studies
#379
of 2,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,829
of 115,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nursing Studies
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,932,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.