↓ Skip to main content

The Continuum of HIV Care in Rural Communities in the United States and Canada

Overview of attention for article published in JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 5,984)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
46 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Continuum of HIV Care in Rural Communities in the United States and Canada
Published in
JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, May 2017
DOI 10.1097/qai.0000000000001329
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The nature of the HIV epidemic in the United States and Canada has changed with a shift towards rural areas. Socioeconomic factors, geography, cultural context, and evolving epidemics of injection drug use are coalescing to move the epidemic into locations where populations are dispersed and healthcare resources are limited. Rural-urban differences along the care continuum demonstrate the implications of this sociogeographic shift. Greater attention is needed to build a more comprehensive understanding of the rural HIV epidemic in the United States and Canada, including research efforts, innovative approaches to care delivery, and greater community engagement in prevention and care.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 48 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 14%
Social Sciences 15 11%
Psychology 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 55 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 378. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2025.
All research outputs
#104,375
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
#7
of 5,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,999
of 355,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
#1
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.