↓ Skip to main content

Formation of BiFeO3 from a Binary Oxide Superlattice Grown by Atomic Layer Deposition

Overview of attention for article published in ChemPhysChem, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Formation of BiFeO3 from a Binary Oxide Superlattice Grown by Atomic Layer Deposition
Published in
ChemPhysChem, June 2017
DOI 10.1002/cphc.201700407
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We report on the growth of polycrystalline BiFeO3 thin films on SiO2 /Si(001) and Pt(111) substrates by atomic layer deposition using the precursors ferrocene, triphenyl-bismuth, and ozone. By growing alternating layers of Fe2 O3 and Bi2 O3 , we employ a superlattice approach and demonstrate an efficient control of the cation stoichiometry. The superlattice decay and the resulting formation of polycrystalline BiFeO3 films are studied by in situ X-ray diffraction, in situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. No intermediate ternary phases are formed and BiFeO3 crystallization is initiated in the Bi2 O3 layers at 450 °C following the diffusion-driven intermixing of the cations. Our study of the BiFeO3 formation provides an insight into the complex interplay between microstructural evolution, grain growth, and bismuth oxide evaporation, with implications for optimization of ferroelectric properties.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 22%
Researcher 5 19%
Other 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 7 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 26%
Materials Science 6 22%
Physics and Astronomy 3 11%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Energy 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2017.
All research outputs
#20,922,316
of 29,992,864 outputs
Outputs from ChemPhysChem
#2,481
of 6,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,479
of 338,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ChemPhysChem
#37
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,992,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,021 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.