↓ Skip to main content

The Journal of Rheumatology

Application of the 2016 EULAR/ACR/PRINTO Classification Criteria for Macrophage Activation Syndrome in Patients with Adult-onset Still Disease.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Rheumatology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Application of the 2016 EULAR/ACR/PRINTO Classification Criteria for Macrophage Activation Syndrome in Patients with Adult-onset Still Disease.
Published in
Journal of Rheumatology, April 2017
DOI 10.3899/jrheum.161286
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sung Soo Ahn, Byung-Woo Yoo, Seung Min Jung, Sang-Won Lee, Yong-Beom Park, Jason Jungsik Song

Abstract

To evaluate the clinical significance of the 2016 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO) classification criteria for macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) in patients with adult-onset Still disease (AOSD). We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with AOSD with fever who were admitted to Severance Hospital between 2005 and 2016. The patients with AOSD were evaluated for MAS using the 2016 classification criteria for MAS. Clinical features, laboratory findings, and overall survival were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the factors associated with in-hospital mortality. Among 64 patients with AOSD, 36 (56.3%) were classified as having MAS. The overall survival rate was significantly lower in patients with MAS than in those without (67% vs 100%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that a low erythrocyte sedimentation rate, a low albumin level, an increase in ferritin of over 2 folds, and the development of MAS on admission were significantly associated with mortality in patients with AOSD. The 2016 EULAR/ACR/PRINTO classification criteria for MAS are potentially useful for the identification of patients with AOSD at high risk for a poor outcome. Febrile patients with AOSD should be monitored with the 2016 classification criteria for MAS in the early diagnosis and proper treatment of MAS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 20%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 9 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 11 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,962,193
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Rheumatology
#1,579
of 3,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,699
of 323,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Rheumatology
#22
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.