↓ Skip to main content

In vitro and In vivo Activity of Theaflavin–Epicatechin Combinations versus Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious Diseases and Therapy, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
In vitro and In vivo Activity of Theaflavin–Epicatechin Combinations versus Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
Published in
Infectious Diseases and Therapy, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40121-017-0161-2
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Acinetobacter baumannii is an important human nosocomial pathogen; most clinical isolates are multidrug-resistant (MDR). Infections caused by A. baumannii often lead to high morbidity and mortality, with limited treatment options. Owing to the small number of anti-Gram-negative antibiotics in the development pipeline, researchers are looking to other natural compounds. The aim of this study was to determine the in vitro kill kinetics, in vivo efficacy and toxicity of theaflavin-epicatechin combinations against MDR A. baumannii. Kill-kinetic assays were performed in Mueller-Hinton 2 broth over 24 h. Toxicity of the compound in the insect model, Galleria mellonella was investigated. The effect of theaflavin-epicatechin combinations on mortality and morbidity were assessed in Acinetobacter baumannii-infected G. mellonella. Larvae were scored for morbidity (melanisation: scale; 0-4) and mortality over 96 h. Kill-kinetic assays revealed that monotherapy had bacteriostatic activity over 24 h, whereas theaflavin-epicatechin combinations were bactericidal (a >3 log reduction in bacterial numbers at 24 h compared with the starting inoculum). Both polyphenols were non-toxic to G. mellonella at concentrations of up to 1000 mg/kg. In vivo treatment assays showed that the combination significantly increased (t test; p ≤ 0.05) larval survival at 96 h to 86% [±17 standard deviation percentage points (pp)] compared to monotherapy with theaflavin (52% ± 14 pp), epicatechin (44% ± 25 pp) or PBS (31% ± 13 pp). Morbidity was also lower in larvae treated with the combination, compared with monotherapy. Polyphenol combinations produce effective antibacterial action against A. baumannii and show great potential for the treatment of infections caused by MDR A. baumannii.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Lecturer 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 11 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Chemistry 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 16 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2017.
All research outputs
#12,983,696
of 22,981,247 outputs
Outputs from Infectious Diseases and Therapy
#295
of 696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,738
of 316,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infectious Diseases and Therapy
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,981,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.