↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Anticholinergic Discontinuation on Cognitive Outcomes in Older People: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs & Aging, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Impact of Anticholinergic Discontinuation on Cognitive Outcomes in Older People: A Systematic Review
Published in
Drugs & Aging, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40266-014-0158-4
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Medicines with anticholinergic properties increase the risks of functional and cognitive decline, morbidity and mortality, institutionalization and length of hospital stay in older people. It is postulated that minimizing anticholinergic burden should result in improved short-term memory, confusion and delirium, and may improve the quality of life and daily functioning of older people.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 158 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 19 12%
Student > Master 16 10%
Researcher 16 10%
Other 12 8%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 42 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 19%
Psychology 19 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 50 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2024.
All research outputs
#4,541,499
of 32,332,113 outputs
Outputs from Drugs & Aging
#319
of 1,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,441
of 369,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs & Aging
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,332,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,601 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.