The objective of this study was to validate the use of a software platform (Explorys, Inc., Cleveland, OH) by determining whether the association observed between obesity and revision of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was obtained within this database. Risk of revision in cohorts with a BMI > 30, as well as cohorts with a BMI between 30-35, 35-40 and >40 was compared to patients with a BMI between 18 and 30 (relative risk, RR). Risk in men versus women was examined. From this database, 70,070 patients were identified that had undergone a TKA. Risk of revision increased as a function of BMI; RR achieved significance in the following cohorts: all patients with a BMI > 30, all patients with a BMI > 40, men with a BMI > 30 and men with a BMI > 40. All other subgroups showed increased RR but did not reach significance. In obese patients, RR was greater in men than in women, and the effect was significant in all groups examined except patients with a BMI between 35 and 40. Data from this study contribute to the process of demonstrating the Explorys software platform is a valid and useful method to investigate associations across large populations.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2014.
All research outputs
#20,221,866
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#538
of 873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,920
of 222,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#13
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 873 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
