↓ Skip to main content

Phase Diagram of Hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine Crystals at High Pressures and Temperatures

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physical Chemistry A, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Phase Diagram of Hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine Crystals at High Pressures and Temperatures
Published in
Journal of Physical Chemistry A, July 2010
DOI 10.1021/jp105226s
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Raman spectroscopy and optical imaging were used to determine the phase boundaries between various hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX) polymorphs. Experiments were performed on single crystals at pressures up to 8.0 GPa and temperatures ranging from room temperature to 550 K. Several distinct pressure regions were found in the RDX response at elevated temperatures: (i) melting of alpha-RDX followed by decomposition, below 2.0 GPa, (ii) decomposition of alpha-RDX between 2.0 and 2.8 GPa, (iii) irreversible transformation of alpha- and gamma-RDX to epsilon-RDX between 2.8 and 6.0 GPa, and (iv) decomposition of gamma-RDX above 6.0 GPa. A triple point between the alpha-, gamma-, and epsilon-RDX was found at 3.7 GPa and 466 K. The alpha-gamma phase transition was confirmed to occur at the same pressure, approximately 3.7 GPa, regardless of temperature, in the range of 295-460 K. Furthermore, it was determined that epsilon-RDX (i) has limited chemical stability under the pressure and temperature conditions where it is produced and (ii) decomposes according to the autocatalytic rate law. The findings reported here have provided new information about the response of RDX crystals at high pressures and temperatures.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 12%
Unknown 22 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Student > Master 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 6 24%
Chemistry 5 20%
Materials Science 4 16%
Engineering 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2014.
All research outputs
#28,604,603
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physical Chemistry A
#7,627
of 12,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,779
of 150,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physical Chemistry A
#35
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,168 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.