↓ Skip to main content

The Arts as a Venue for Developmental Science: Realizing a Latent Opportunity

Overview of attention for article published in Child Development, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Arts as a Venue for Developmental Science: Realizing a Latent Opportunity
Published in
Child Development, September 2017
DOI 10.1111/cdev.12884
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Children in all cultures readily engage in artistic activities, yet the arts (dance, drama, drawing, and music) have traditionally been marginal topics in the discipline of developmental science. We argue that developmental psychologists cannot afford to ignore such naturalistic activities that involve so many basic phenomena-attention, engagement, motivation, emotion regulation, understanding of others, and so on. Despite historical issues with research methodologies and overdrawn conclusions, a current wave of methodologically rigorous studies shows the depth of arts learning, as well as how arts engagement can be harnessed for transfer to other skills. Here, we present 21 exemplary research case studies, covering an age range of 18 months to 17 years old and discuss how the arts are no more difficult to study than other real-world developmental phenomena and deserve a thorough examination.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 147 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Researcher 10 7%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 56 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 44 30%
Arts and Humanities 8 5%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 61 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,270,721
of 30,038,132 outputs
Outputs from Child Development
#657
of 4,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,148
of 330,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Development
#19
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,038,132 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.