↓ Skip to main content

Pushing the Limits of Oxygen Balance in 1,3,4-Oxadiazoles

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Chemical Society, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pushing the Limits of Oxygen Balance in 1,3,4-Oxadiazoles
Published in
Journal of the American Chemical Society, June 2017
DOI 10.1021/jacs.7b05158
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Gem-trinitromethyl groups were introduced into a 1,3,4-oxadiazole ring to give the first example of a bifunctionalized single five-membered ring with six nitro groups. 2,5-Bis(trinitromethyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazole (12) has a high calculated crystal density of 2.007 g cm-3 at 150 K and a very high positive oxygen balance (39.12%) which make it a strong candidate as a high energy dense oxidizer. The dihy-droxylammonium and dihydrazinium salts of bis(trinitromethyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazole (5 and 6) exhibit excel-lent detonation properties (5, vD = 9266 m s-1, P = 38.9 GPa; 6, vD = 8900 m s-1, P = 36.3 GPa) and ac-ceptable impact sensitivities (5 20 J, 6 19 J), which are superior to those of RDX (7.4 J) and HMX (7.4 J). Such attractive features support the application potential of the gem-polynitromethyl group in the design of advanced energetic materials. Surprisingly, 2,5-bis(trinitromethyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazole (12) is more thermally stable and less sensitive than its bis(dinitromethyl) analogue, 8. The compounds were fully characterized by using IR and multinuclear NMR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, and differential scan-ning calorimetry (DSC). The structures of the energetic salts (3•H2O, 5 and 13) and neutral compounds (8 and 12) were confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 34%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 17 59%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 10 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2017.
All research outputs
#23,930,967
of 33,610,548 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#78,835
of 86,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,604
of 359,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#452
of 540 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,610,548 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 540 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.