↓ Skip to main content

Does the weakening of intrinsic foot muscles cause the decrease of medial longitudinal arch height?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physical Therapy Science, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does the weakening of intrinsic foot muscles cause the decrease of medial longitudinal arch height?
Published in
Journal of Physical Therapy Science, June 2017
DOI 10.1589/jpts.29.1001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazunori Okamura, Shusaku Kanai, Sadaaki Oki, Satoshi Tanaka, Naohisa Hirata, Yoshiaki Sakamura, Norikatsu Idemoto, Hiroki Wada, Akira Otsuka

Abstract

[Purpose] There are no reliable evidences that the weakening of intrinsic foot muscles causes the decrease of the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) height. The purpose of this study was to confirm whether the fatigue of intrinsic foot muscles decrease the MLA height during standing and gait using 3D motion analysis system. [Subjects and Methods] Twenty healthy male subjects participated in this study. Foot kinematics was measured using an Oxford Foot Model before and after fatigue-inducing exercises of the abductor hallucis and flexor hallucis brevis muscles. [Results] Following fatigue-inducing exercise, in both standing and gait, the MLA height did not decrease but slightly increased. In addition, the reduction of a rear foot eversion angle was noted. [Conclusion] Fatigue of the abductor hallucis and flexor hallucis brevis muscles did not cause a change associated with collapsing of the MLA during both standing and gait. This suggested that the MLA support force from these muscles would be compensated by other MLA support structures, such as extrinsic foot muscles.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 20%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Other 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 27 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 18%
Sports and Recreations 15 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 34 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2017.
All research outputs
#7,000,448
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physical Therapy Science
#436
of 1,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,384
of 331,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physical Therapy Science
#9
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.