You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Medication use in pregnancy: a cross-sectional, multinational web-based study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004365 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A Lupattelli, O Spigset, M J Twigg, K Zagorodnikova, A C Mårdby, M E Moretti, M Drozd, A Panchaud, K Hämeen-Anttila, A Rieutord, R Gjergja Juraski, M Odalovic, D Kennedy, G Rudolf, H Juch, A Passier, I Björnsdóttir, H Nordeng |
| Abstract |
Intercountry comparability between studies on medication use in pregnancy is difficult due to dissimilarities in study design and methodology. This study aimed to examine patterns and factors associated with medications use in pregnancy from a multinational perspective, with emphasis on type of medication utilised and indication for use. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 28% |
| United States | 3 | 17% |
| Argentina | 2 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 11% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 72% |
| Scientists | 4 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 427 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 419 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 73 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 52 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 11% |
| Researcher | 35 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 64 | 15% |
| Unknown | 129 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 21% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 75 | 18% |
| Psychology | 27 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 57 | 13% |
| Unknown | 143 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#772,807
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#1,301
of 25,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,254
of 238,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#10
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.