↓ Skip to main content

Cost-Effectiveness of Pit-and-Fissure Sealants on Primary Molars in Medicaid-Enrolled Children

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Public Health, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cost-Effectiveness of Pit-and-Fissure Sealants on Primary Molars in Medicaid-Enrolled Children
Published in
American Journal of Public Health, January 2014
DOI 10.2105/ajph.2013.301588
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We compared the incremental cost-effectiveness of 2 primary molar sealant strategies-always seal and never seal-with standard care for Medicaid-enrolled children.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 136 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Researcher 8 6%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 48 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 36%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 54 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2014.
All research outputs
#22,760,732
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Public Health
#12,226
of 12,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,550
of 319,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Public Health
#152
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.