↓ Skip to main content

Microsurgical Bypass Training Rat Model: Part 2–Anastomosis Configurations

Overview of attention for article published in World Neurosurgery, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Microsurgical Bypass Training Rat Model: Part 2–Anastomosis Configurations
Published in
World Neurosurgery, June 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.066
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Mastery of microsurgical anastomosis is key to achieving good outcomes in cerebrovascular bypass procedures. Animal models (especially rodents) provide an optimal pre-clinical bypass training platform. However, the existing models for practicing different anastomosis configurations have several limitations. We sought to optimize the use of the rat's abdominal aorta and common iliac arteries (CIA) for practicing the 3 main anastomosis configurations commonly used in cerebrovascular surgery. Thirteen male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent inhalant anesthesia. The abdominal aorta and the CIAs were exposed. The distances between the major branches of the aorta were measured to find the optimal location for an end-to-end anastomosis. Also, the feasibility of performing side-to-side and end-to-side anastomoses between the CIAs was assessed. All bypass configurations could be performed between the left renal artery and the CIA bifurcation. The longest segments of the aorta without major branches were (1) between the left renal and left iliolumbar arteries (16.9mm ± 4.6), and (2) between the right iliolumbar artery and the aortic bifurcation (9.7mm ± 4.7). The CIAs could be juxtaposed for an average length of 7.6mm ± 1.3, for a side-to-side anastomosis. The left CIA could be successfully reimplanted onto the right CIA at an average distance of 9.1mm ± 1.6 from the aortic bifurcation. Our results show that rat's abdominal aorta and CIAs may be effectively used for all the anastomosis configurations used in cerebral revascularization procedures. We also provide technical nuances and anatomical descriptions to plan for practicing each bypass configuration.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Other 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 9 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 41%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 9 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from World Neurosurgery
#5,801
of 7,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,435
of 329,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Neurosurgery
#108
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,045 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.