↓ Skip to main content

The history of effective population size and genetic diversity in the Yellowstone grizzly (Ursus arctos): Implications for conservation

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
461 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The history of effective population size and genetic diversity in the Yellowstone grizzly (Ursus arctos): Implications for conservation
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2003
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0735531100
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 461 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 7 2%
United States 7 2%
India 5 1%
Canada 3 <1%
Czechia 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Other 15 3%
Unknown 412 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 102 22%
Researcher 102 22%
Student > Master 66 14%
Student > Bachelor 43 9%
Other 22 5%
Other 79 17%
Unknown 47 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 277 60%
Environmental Science 71 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 2%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Other 16 3%
Unknown 54 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2025.
All research outputs
#1,235,264
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#17,519
of 118,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,264
of 90,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#25
of 592 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 592 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.