↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Investigating DNA‐, RNA‐, and protein‐based features as a means to discriminate pathogenic synonymous variants
Published in
Human Mutation, July 2017
DOI 10.1002/humu.23283
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Synonymous single nucleotide variants (SNVs), although they do not alter the encoded protein sequences, have been implicated in many genetic diseases. Experimental studies indicate that synonymous SNVs can lead to changes in the secondary and tertiary structures of DNA and RNA, thereby impacting translational efficiency, co-translational protein folding as well as the binding of DNA/RNA-binding proteins. However, the importance of these various features in disease phenotypes is not clearly understood. Here we have built a support vector machine model (termed DDIG-SN) as a means to discriminate disease-causing synonymous variants. The model was trained and evaluated on nearly 900 disease-causing variants. The method achieves robust performance with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.84 and 0.85 for protein-stratified 10-fold cross-validation and independent testing, respectively. We were able to show that the disease-causing effects in the immediate proximity to exon-intron junctions (1-3 bp) are driven by the loss of splicing motif strength, whereas the gain of splicing motif strength is the primary cause in regions further away from the splice site (4-69 bp). The method is available as a part of the DDIG server at http://sparks-lab.org/ddig. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 19 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 20 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2017.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Human Mutation
#2,588
of 2,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,168
of 325,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Mutation
#41
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,982 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.