↓ Skip to main content

Antigen-capturing nanoparticles improve the abscopal effect and cancer immunotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Nanotechnology, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
108 X users
patent
13 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
409 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Antigen-capturing nanoparticles improve the abscopal effect and cancer immunotherapy
Published in
Nature Nanotechnology, June 2017
DOI 10.1038/nnano.2017.113
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Immunotherapy holds tremendous promise for improving cancer treatment. To administer radiotherapy with immunotherapy has been shown to improve immune responses and can elicit the 'abscopal effect'. Unfortunately, response rates for this strategy remain low. Herein we report an improved cancer immunotherapy approach that utilizes antigen-capturing nanoparticles (AC-NPs). We engineered several AC-NP formulations and demonstrated that the set of protein antigens captured by each AC-NP formulation is dependent on the NP surface properties. We showed that AC-NPs deliver tumour-specific proteins to antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and significantly improve the efficacy of αPD-1 (anti-programmed cell death 1) treatment using the B16F10 melanoma model, generating up to a 20% cure rate compared with 0% without AC-NPs. Mechanistic studies revealed that AC-NPs induced an expansion of CD8(+) cytotoxic T cells and increased both CD4(+)T/Treg and CD8(+)T/Treg ratios (Treg, regulatory T cells). Our work presents a novel strategy to improve cancer immunotherapy with nanotechnology.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 108 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 409 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 409 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 97 24%
Student > Master 52 13%
Researcher 48 12%
Student > Bachelor 27 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 49 12%
Unknown 117 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 11%
Chemistry 41 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 32 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 7%
Other 93 23%
Unknown 136 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 185. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2026.
All research outputs
#273,234
of 34,639,378 outputs
Outputs from Nature Nanotechnology
#151
of 4,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,533
of 362,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Nanotechnology
#3
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,639,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.