↓ Skip to main content

Merging contemporary learning theory with mental health promotion to produce an effective schools-based program

Overview of attention for article published in Nurse Education in Practice, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Merging contemporary learning theory with mental health promotion to produce an effective schools-based program
Published in
Nurse Education in Practice, May 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.nepr.2017.05.005
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Approximately three quarters of all major mental disorders begin in adolescence. Finding ways to buffer against stress, access social support and connection and flexibly draw upon a range of coping mechanisms are vital strategies that young people can use to promote mental health and wellbeing and to navigate this turbulent life transition successfully. Within Australia, like other parts of the world such as the UK and the USA, it is a sad reality that when young people do become distressed they are not self-caring or supporting others effectively, and not seeking or receiving appropriate help. In order to respond proactively to this issue, a nurse-initiated mental health promotion program was developed. It is termed, iCARE, which stands for Creating Awareness, Resilience and Enhanced Mental Health. The aim of this paper is to discuss the underpinning educational theory that assists in developing in young people a sense of belonging, empathy, self-care and resilience, and why the strategies chosen to engage young people are likely to be effective.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 169 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Researcher 11 7%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 58 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 15%
Social Sciences 17 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 6%
Arts and Humanities 6 4%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 64 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2017.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Nurse Education in Practice
#1,151
of 1,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,916
of 327,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nurse Education in Practice
#14
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.