↓ Skip to main content

Observed Flow Compensation Associated with the MOC at 26.5°N in the Atlantic

Overview of attention for article published in Science, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
5 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Observed Flow Compensation Associated with the MOC at 26.5°N in the Atlantic
Published in
Science, August 2007
DOI 10.1126/science.1141293
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (MOC), which provides one-quarter of the global meridional heat transport, is composed of a number of separate flow components. How changes in the strength of each of those components may affect that of the others has been unclear because of a lack of adequate data. We continuously observed the MOC at 26.5 degrees N for 1 year using end-point measurements of density, bottom pressure, and ocean currents; cable measurements across the Straits of Florida; and wind stress. The different transport components largely compensate for each other, thus confirming the validity of our monitoring approach. The MOC varied over the period of observation by +/-5.7 x 10(6) cubic meters per second, with density-inferred and wind-driven transports contributing equally to it. We find evidence for depth-independent compensation for the wind-driven surface flow.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Norway 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 194 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 62 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 20%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Professor 15 7%
Student > Master 15 7%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 29 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 118 57%
Environmental Science 28 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Physics and Astronomy 8 4%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 33 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,696,919
of 28,766,646 outputs
Outputs from Science
#25,965
of 87,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,266
of 87,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#82
of 363 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,766,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 87,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 363 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.