↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Clinical Implications of the T790M Mutation in Disease Characteristics and Treatment Response in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Mutated Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Published in
Clinical Lung Cancer, June 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.cllc.2017.06.004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The secondary T790M mutation accounts for more than 50% of acquired tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent reports suggest this resistance mutation may be more common among patients with longer progression-free survival (PFS) on first-line TKI therapy, but much is still unknown. Our group collected medical records from patients who underwent a biopsy for T790M mutation testing while screening for clinical trials involving the drug rociletinib (CO-1686), a T790M mutation-specific TKI. Medical records were retrospectively analyzed for demographic data, PFS, and best response to previous therapies. Our patient cohort included 69 T790M(+) patients and 28 T790M(-) patients. Patients who later developed a T790M mutation had a longer PFS on first-line TKI therapy (12.0 vs. 9.0 months, P = .021), but overall response rate (ORR) was the same (75.0% vs. 81.0%, P = .76). There was no difference in PFS on TKI rechallenge (4.0 vs. 3.0 months, P = .94), although there was a trend toward higher ORR in T790M(+) patients (22.2% vs. 0%, P = .12). T790M(+) patients had a longer PFS on initial chemotherapy treatment (5.0 vs. 4.0 months, P = .025) and a trend toward higher ORR (40.0% vs. 21.4%, P = .31). Our study confirms that tumors expressing T790M have a more indolent progression of disease compared with their T790M(-) counterparts when treated with both first-line TKI and cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 14 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Lung Cancer
#1,008
of 1,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,740
of 330,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Lung Cancer
#13
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.