↓ Skip to main content

Electrochemical and structural investigation of the interactions between naphthalene diimides and metal cations

Overview of attention for article published in Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Electrochemical and structural investigation of the interactions between naphthalene diimides and metal cations
Published in
Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, January 2017
DOI 10.1039/c7dt02067h
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The effects of Li(+) and Mg(2+) on the electrochemical behaviour and photoreduction of N,N'-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)naphthalene diimide (Dipp2NDI) have been investigated using cyclic voltammetry and UV-vis spectroscopy. Strong cation-anion interactions between Li(+) or Mg(2+) and [Dipp2NDI](2-) result in solvent-dependent anodic shifts of the NDI˙(-/2-) redox couple. In organic solvents of moderate dielectric constant and donor ability, the two, one-electron redox processes typically observed for Dipp2NDI merge into a single, two-electron process. This strong metal cation effect has been leveraged for the photoreduction of Dipp2NDI to [Dipp2NDI](2-)via a disproportionation process. Chemical reduction of Dipp2NDI with iPrMgCl has allowed the isolation of Mg(2+) complexes of [Dipp2NDI](2-). Single crystal X-ray diffraction was used to determine the structure of a dimeric complex, [(Dipp2NDI)Mg2(THF)3]2, that features strong coordination of Mg(2+) by the oxygen atoms of the reduced NDI.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 29%
Student > Master 6 25%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 16 67%
Materials Science 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Unknown 5 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2017.
All research outputs
#23,302,843
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
#10,457
of 24,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#296,676
of 462,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
#509
of 1,654 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,753 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,654 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.