↓ Skip to main content

Frequency of exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an analysis of the SPIROMICS cohort

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Frequency of exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an analysis of the SPIROMICS cohort
Published in
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, June 2017
DOI 10.1016/s2213-2600(17)30207-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

MeiLan K Han, Pedro M Quibrera, Elizabeth E Carretta, R Graham Barr, Eugene R Bleecker, Russell P Bowler, Christopher B Cooper, Alejandro Comellas, David J Couper, Jeffrey L Curtis, Gerard Criner, Mark T Dransfield, Nadia N Hansel, Eric A Hoffman, Richard E Kanner, Jerry A Krishnan, Carlos H Martinez, Cheryl B Pirozzi, Wanda K O'Neal, Stephen Rennard, Donald P Tashkin, Jadwiga A Wedzicha, Prescott Woodruff, Robert Paine, Fernando J Martinez, SPIROMICS investigators, Neil E Alexis, Wayne H Anderson, R Graham Barr, Eugene R Bleecker, Richard C Boucher, Russell P Bowler, Elizabeth E Carretta, Stephanie A Christenson, Alejandro P Comellas, Christopher B Cooper, David J Couper, Gerard J Criner, Ronald G Crystal, Jeffrey L Curtis, Claire M Doerschuk, Mark T Dransfield, Christine M Freeman, MeiLan K Han, Nadia N Hansel, Annette T Hastie, Eric A Hoffman, Robert J Kaner, Richard E Kanner, Eric C Kleerup, Jerry A Krishnan, Lisa M LaVange, Stephen C Lazarus, Fernando J Martinez, Deborah A Meyers, John D Newell, Elizabeth C Oelsner, Wanda K O'Neal, Robert Paine, Nirupama Putcha, Stephen I. Rennard, Donald P Tashkin, Mary Beth Scholand, J Michael Wells, Robert A Wise, Prescott G Woodruff

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 225 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Master 23 10%
Other 21 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 53 24%
Unknown 66 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 36%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 74 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2026.
All research outputs
#738,393
of 32,250,385 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#489
of 3,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,797
of 351,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#4
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,250,385 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 74.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.