↓ Skip to main content

Psychiatric Comorbidity and Other Psychological Factors in Patients with “Chronic Lyme Disease”

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Medicine, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
7 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
3 Redditors
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Psychiatric Comorbidity and Other Psychological Factors in Patients with “Chronic Lyme Disease”
Published in
American Journal of Medicine, September 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.02.022
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There is no evidence of current or previous Borrelia burgdorferi infection in most patients evaluated at university-based Lyme disease referral centers. Instead, psychological factors likely exacerbate the persistent diffuse symptoms or "Chronic Multisymptom Illness" (CMI) incorrectly ascribed to an ongoing chronic infection with B. burgdorferi. The objective of this study was to assess the medical and psychiatric status of such patients and compare these findings to those from patients without CMI.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Norway 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 117 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 19%
Student > Master 16 13%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Other 10 8%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 24 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 18%
Psychology 16 13%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 29 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2025.
All research outputs
#1,586,049
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Medicine
#760
of 10,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,377
of 145,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Medicine
#3
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.