↓ Skip to main content

When Shoes Become Hammers: Goal-Derived Categorization Training Enhances Problem-Solving Performance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
When Shoes Become Hammers: Goal-Derived Categorization Training Enhances Problem-Solving Performance
Published in
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition, July 2006
DOI 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.935
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Problem-solving theories have not examined how solvers navigate their knowledge to interpret problem situations or to plan strategies toward goals. In this article, the author argues that success in problem solving depends on the solver's ability to construct goal-derived categories, namely categories that are formed ad hoc to serve goals during the instantiation of problem frames. Experiment 1 (N = 140) showed improved problem-solving performance after training to construct goal-derived categories. Experiment 2 (N = 80) demonstrated that effects of training in category construction can be obtained without participants being explicitly informed regarding the relevance of training to problem solving. These studies suggest that problem solving is a dynamic expression of goal-directed cognition and provide evidence for the involvement of categorization in problem-solving processes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 94 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 20%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Master 11 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 10%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 17 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 50 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 6%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 19 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2016.
All research outputs
#22,314,961
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition
#935
of 3,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,467
of 126,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.