↓ Skip to main content

Magnetic Anisotropy from Main-Group Elements: Halides versus Group 14 Elements

Overview of attention for article published in Inorganic Chemistry, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Magnetic Anisotropy from Main-Group Elements: Halides versus Group 14 Elements
Published in
Inorganic Chemistry, June 2017
DOI 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00923
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Precise modulation of the magnetic anisotropy of a transition-metal center would affect physical properties ranging from photoluminescence to magnetism. Over the past decade, exerting nuanced control over ligand fields enabled the incorporation of significant magnetic anisotropy in a number of mononuclear transition-metal complexes. An alternate approach to increasing spin-orbit coupling relies upon using heavy diamagnetic main-group elements as sources of magnetic anisotropy. Interacting first-row transition metals with main-group elements enables the transfer of magnetic anisotropy to the paramagnetic metal center without restricting coordination geometry. We sought to study the effect of covalency on this anisotropy transfer by probing the effect of halides in comparison to early main-group elements. Toward that end, we synthesized a series of four isostructural heterobimetallic complexes, with germanium or tin covalently bound to a triplet spin Fe(II) center. These complexes are ligated by a halide (Br(-) or I(-)) in the apical position to yield a series of complexes with variation in the mass of the main-group elements. This series enabled us to interrogate which electronic structure factors influence the heavy-atom effect. Using a suite of approaches including magnetometry, computation, and Mössbauer spectroscopy, we probed the electronic structure and the spin-orbit coupling, as parametrized by axial zero-field splitting across the series of complexes, and found an increase in zero-field splitting from -11.8 to -17.9 cm(-1) by increasing the axial ligand mass. Through direct comparison between halides and group 14 elements, we observe a greater impact on magnetic anisotropy from the halide interaction. We attribute this counterintuitive effect to a larger spin population on the halide elements, despite greater covalency in the group 14 interactions. These results recommend modification of the intuitive design principle of increasing covalency toward a deeper focus on the interactions of the spin-bearing orbitals.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 34%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Professor 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 34 68%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Unknown 15 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2019.
All research outputs
#11,023,666
of 32,396,617 outputs
Outputs from Inorganic Chemistry
#7,337
of 28,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,526
of 351,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inorganic Chemistry
#58
of 310 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,396,617 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,890 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 310 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.