↓ Skip to main content

Unexpected Importance of Aromatic–Aliphatic and Aliphatic Side Chain–Backbone Interactions in the Stability of Amyloids

Overview of attention for article published in Chemistry - A European Journal, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unexpected Importance of Aromatic–Aliphatic and Aliphatic Side Chain–Backbone Interactions in the Stability of Amyloids
Published in
Chemistry - A European Journal, July 2017
DOI 10.1002/chem.201701351
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dragan B. Ninković, Dušan P. Malenov, Predrag V. Petrović, Edward N. Brothers, Shuqiang Niu, Michael B. Hall, Milivoj R. Belić, Snežana D. Zarić

Abstract

The role of aromatic and nonaromatic amino acids in amyloid formation was elucidated by calculating interaction energies between β-sheets in amyloid model systems using density functional theory (B3LYP-D3/6-31G*). The model systems were based on experimental crystal structures of two types of amyloids: (1) with aromatic amino acids and (2) without aromatic amino acids. Data show that these two types of amyloids have similar interaction energies, supporting experimental findings that aromatic amino acids are not essential for amyloid formation. However, different factors contribute to the stability of these two types of amyloids. On one hand, in (1) presence of aromatic amino acids contribute significantly to the strength of interactions between side chains; interactions between aromatic and aliphatic side chains are the strongest, followed by aromatic-aromatic interactions, while aliphatic-aliphatic interactions are the weakest. On the other hand, stability of amyloids (2), without aromatic residues, is caused by interactions of aliphatic side chains with the backbone and, in some cases, by hydrogen bonds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 39%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 11 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 14%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 7 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2017.
All research outputs
#19,869,877
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Chemistry - A European Journal
#16,865
of 22,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,321
of 320,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemistry - A European Journal
#442
of 686 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,737 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 686 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.