↓ Skip to main content

Factors influencing social and health outcomes after motor vehicle crash injury: an inception cohort study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Factors influencing social and health outcomes after motor vehicle crash injury: an inception cohort study protocol
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-199
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There is growing evidence that health and social outcomes following motor vehicle crash injury are related to cognitive and emotional responses of the injured individual, as well as relationships between the injured individual and the compensation systems with which they interact. As most of this evidence comes from other states in Australia or overseas, investigation is therefore warranted to identify the key determinants of health and social outcomes following injury in the context of the New South Wales motor accident insurance scheme.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 82 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Master 9 11%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Professor 5 6%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 28 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 25%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Psychology 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 31 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2014.
All research outputs
#16,540,133
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,009
of 4,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,553
of 239,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#136
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.