↓ Skip to main content

ClonEstiMate, a Bayesian method for quantifying rates of clonality of populations genotyped at two‐time steps

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Ecology Resources, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
ClonEstiMate, a Bayesian method for quantifying rates of clonality of populations genotyped at two‐time steps
Published in
Molecular Ecology Resources, August 2017
DOI 10.1111/1755-0998.12698
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Partial clonality is commonly used in Eukaryotes and has large consequences for their evolution and ecology. Assessing accurately the relative importance of clonal versus sexual reproduction matters for studying and managing such species. Here, we proposed a Bayesian approach, ClonEstiMate, to infer rates of clonality c from populations sampled twice over a short time interval, ideally one generation time. The method relies on the likelihood of the transitions between genotype frequencies of ancestral and descendent populations, using an extended Wright-Fisher model explicitly integrating reproductive modes. Our model provides posterior probability distribution of inferred c, given the assumed rates of mutation, as well as inbreeding and selfing when occurring. Tested under various conditions, this model provided accurate inferences of c, especially when the amount of information was modest, i.e. low sample sizes, few loci, low polymorphism and strong linkage disequilibrium. Inferences remained robust when mutation models and rates were misinformed. However, the method was sensitive to moderate frequencies of null alleles and when the time interval between required samplings exceeding two generations. Misinformed rates on mating modes (inbreeding and selfing) also resulted in biased inferences. Our method was tested on eleven datasets covering five partially clonal species, for which the extent of clonality was formerly deciphered. It delivered highly consistent results with previous information on the biology of those species. ClonEstiMate represents a powerful tool for detecting and inferring clonality in finite populations, genotyped with SNPs or microsatellites. It is freely available at "h t tp://https://w">https://w w w 6.rennes.inra.fr / igepp_eng/ Productions/ Software. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 30%
Student > Master 6 15%
Researcher 5 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 40%
Environmental Science 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 12 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,609,126
of 33,171,986 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Ecology Resources
#557
of 2,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,308
of 349,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Ecology Resources
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,171,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.