↓ Skip to main content

Strength Versus Muscle Power-Specific Resistance Training in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Overview of attention for article published in Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
337 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Strength Versus Muscle Power-Specific Resistance Training in Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Published in
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences, January 2008
DOI 10.1093/gerona/63.1.83
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 337 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 325 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 15%
Student > Bachelor 51 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 8%
Researcher 23 7%
Other 58 17%
Unknown 88 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 88 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 45 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 5%
Social Sciences 15 4%
Other 29 9%
Unknown 106 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,164,547
of 34,545,128 outputs
Outputs from Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences
#1,253
of 4,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,246
of 227,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,545,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.