| Title |
Contesting the Value of “Creating Shared Value”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
California Management Review, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1525/cmr.2014.56.2.130 |
| Authors |
Andrew Crane, Guido Palazzo, Laura J. Spence, Dirk Matten |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 18% |
| United States | 4 | 12% |
| Australia | 3 | 9% |
| India | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 59% |
| Scientists | 13 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,978 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | <1% |
| Italy | 4 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Denmark | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Mozambique | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1942 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 557 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 223 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 219 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 107 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 104 | 5% |
| Other | 319 | 16% |
| Unknown | 449 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 929 | 47% |
| Social Sciences | 186 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 111 | 6% |
| Engineering | 57 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 47 | 2% |
| Other | 170 | 9% |
| Unknown | 478 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,109,467
of 25,939,391 outputs
Outputs from California Management Review
#28
of 541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,924
of 324,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from California Management Review
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,939,391 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them