↓ Skip to main content

Obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
12 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
498 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2014
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1312693111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 498 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Bolivia, Plurinational State of 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 483 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 82 16%
Student > Master 70 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 11%
Student > Bachelor 38 8%
Lecturer 20 4%
Other 81 16%
Unknown 150 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 187 38%
Social Sciences 31 6%
Environmental Science 31 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 19 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 2%
Other 50 10%
Unknown 169 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2025.
All research outputs
#1,248,396
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#17,622
of 119,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,233
of 268,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#229
of 1,022 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,022 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.