↓ Skip to main content

Identifying augmented renal clearance in trauma patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, The, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Identifying augmented renal clearance in trauma patients
Published in
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, The, April 2017
DOI 10.1097/ta.0000000000001387
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Augmented renal clearance (ARC) is common in trauma patients and associated with subtherapeutic antimicrobial concentrations. This study reported the incidence of ARC, identified ARC risk factors and described a model to predict ARC (i.e.,ARCTIC) that is specific to trauma patients. Consecutive trauma patients who were admitted to the ICU between March 2015 and January 2016 and had a measured creatinine clearance (CrCl) were considered for inclusion. Patients were excluded if their serum creatinine (SCr) was >1.3 mg/dL. ARC was defined as a measured CrCl ≥130ml/min. Demographic and trauma-specific variables were then compared and multivariate analysis was performed. Using these results, a weighted scoring system was constructed and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. ARCTIC score cut-offs were chosen based on sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). The derived scoring system was then compared to a previously published scoring system for accuracy. There were 133 patients with a mean age of 48±19 years and SCr of 0.8±0.2 mg/dL. The mean measured CrCl was 168±65 ml/min and the incidence of ARC was 67%. Multivariate analysis revealed the following risk factors for ARC [odds ratios (95% CI)]: age <56 [58.3(5.2-658.9), age 56 to 75 [13.5(1.2-151.7)], SCr<0.7mg/dL [12.5(3-52.6)] and male gender [6.9(1.9-24.9)]. Using these results, the ARCTIC scoring system was: 4 points if age <56, 3 points if age 57-75, 3 points if SCr <0.7 mg/dL and 2 points if male gender. ROC curve analysis revealed an area (95% CI) of 0.813(0.735-0.892), p<.001. An ARCTIC score of ≥ 6 had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 0.843, 0.682, 0.843 and 0.682, respectively. The incidence of ARC in trauma patients is high. The ARCTIC score represents a practical, pragmatic system that can be easily applied at the bedside. An ARCTIC score ≥6 represents an appropriate cut-off to screen for ARC where antimicrobial adjustments should be considered. Prognostic and epidemiologic study, level III.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 18%
Other 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 18 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 21%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 22 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2025.
All research outputs
#4,197,492
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, The
#1,293
of 5,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,793
of 353,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, The
#22
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.