↓ Skip to main content

Self-care and end of life care—patients’ and carers’ experience a qualitative study utilising serial triangulated interviews

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Self-care and end of life care—patients’ and carers’ experience a qualitative study utilising serial triangulated interviews
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00520-011-1252-3
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study aimed to understand patient and carer experiences of end of life care and to explore how patients care for themselves at the end of life in Scotland. Research questions: (1) From the perspectives of patients and carers, what are their experience of advanced cancer and end of life care? (2) What self-care strategies enable patient and carers to cope with their end of life care?

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 3%
Spain 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 127 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 28 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 37 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 18%
Social Sciences 12 9%
Psychology 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 35 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2016.
All research outputs
#15,294,762
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#3,076
of 4,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,974
of 124,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#13
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.