↓ Skip to main content

Body composition changes in the first month after sleeve gastrectomy based on gender and anatomic site

Overview of attention for article published in Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Body composition changes in the first month after sleeve gastrectomy based on gender and anatomic site
Published in
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, January 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.soard.2017.01.017
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) induces acute weight loss, but its impact on the very early postoperative changes in body composition (BC) is less clear. This longitudinal study examined the BC changes in the first month after SG according to gender and anatomic site. BC (lean tissue mass [LTM] and fat mass [FM]) were determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in 41 obese patients (33 women, 80.5%) just before SG and 1 month later. University hospital of Montpellier, France. One month after SG, mean weight loss was -9.8±2.6 kg, with a significant decrease in LTM and FM (kg) ranging from -7.3% to 9.5%, depending on site. FM (kg) loss in men exceeded that in women at whole body, upper limbs, and trunk. FM (%) and the LTM/FM ratio decreased only in the trunk in men and the lower limbs in women, but the gender difference was only observed for the trunk. In women, age was positively correlated with relative FM variation (% and kg) in the lower limbs and negatively correlated with LTM and LTM/FM. In men, weight was negatively correlated with the relative LTM and FM (kg) variations in the upper limbs. SG induces acute weight loss, but this loss comprises losses in both FM and LTM. Because excessive LTM loss can have deleterious consequences, preventive strategies should be implemented soon after bariatric surgery. The specific changes in BC are highlighted according to gender and anatomic site.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Master 4 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 29 47%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 24%
Sports and Recreations 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 31 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2017.
All research outputs
#27,381,678
of 33,154,028 outputs
Outputs from Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
#2,292
of 2,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#357,226
of 455,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
#48
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,154,028 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.